For a few weeks now, we have been talking about news stories
about higher education—some that might immediately influence your
teenager’s decision about where to apply or later about where to
attend and others that might take longer to impact your family.
In this episode, we are going to take a look at a new report
just out this month that could impact thousands and thousands of
families every year. It has a message that needs to be heard.
I want to thank Sarah D. Sparks, who wrote about this new report
at Inside School Research, one of the blogs sponsored by
Education Week. Her article—entitled “Three Myths Keeping Bright Kids in Poverty from
Going to Top Colleges” (January 11, 2016)—was so good that I
immediately went to look for the full report. You would, too, after
reading her lead:
If you are at the top of your class in a high-poverty school,
you have a significantly better chance of dying in a car crash than
attending an Ivy League school. (quoted from the article)
Hard to believe. She later quotes Harold Levy, former chancellor
of the New York City Public Schools and currently executive
director of the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation, which co-authored the
report with The Century Foundation. Levy said:
‘College admissions for kids in poverty is profoundly unfair. .
. . I thought if you were really poor and really smart you wrote
your own ticket, and that turns out to be just wrong.’ (quoted from
the article)
1. The Report
The 50-page report is entitled True Merit: Ensuring Our Brightest Students Have
Access to Our Best Colleges and Universities. Although I
can’t read the whole thing to you in this episode, I would like to
present some hard-to-swallow statistics and some conclusions
offered—all of which should make you interested enough to take a
look at the whole report:
- At the most competitive colleges, only 3 percent of
students come from families with incomes in the bottom 25 percent
of the income distribution, but 72 percent of students come from
families with incomes in the top 25 percent. At highly
competitive and very competitive colleges (the next
two categories), only 7 percent of students in each group of
colleges come from families in the bottom 25 percent. The report
comments that there are “thousands of students from economically
disadvantaged households who, despite attending less-resourced
schools and growing up with less intellectual stimulation and
advantages, do extremely well in school, love learning, are
extraordinarily bright and capable, and would do very well at
selective institutions if offered admissions. They are just being
ignored.”
- The report goes on to explain that the “underrepresentation of
high-achieving, low-income students at the nation’s selective
institutions stems from two factors: low-income students are less
likely to apply to selective schools, and low-income students who
do apply receive inadequate consideration in the admissions and
financial aid process.” That is quite an indictment of the
system.
- Looking further into that explanation, the report notes that
its authors’ “research shows that only 23 percent of
high-achieving, low-income students apply to a selective school,
compared with 48 percent of high-achieving, high-income students. .
. . Termed ‘under-matching’ by researchers, many high-achieving,
low-income students choose not to apply to schools whose student
bodies have high levels of academic ability on par with their own,
and instead apply to schools where the average student’s academic
capacity is lower than their own.”
- The report’s authors found that “high-achieving students from
the wealthiest families were three times as likely to
enroll in a highly selective college as those from the poorest
families (24 versus 8 percent). Other researchers have demonstrated
that this trend holds true even among the most talented low-income
students who score in the top ten percent nationwide on the SAT or
ACT.”
- So, how important is it, in the long run, to attend a highly
selective college? The report speaks quite clearly to this
question: “. . . our
analysis is unequivocal: high-achieving students who attend more
selective schools graduate at higher rates, earn higher incomes,
and are more likely to pursue a graduate degree. . . . This remains
true even after controlling for [students’] academic ability. In
other words, where you go to school matters.”
- And here is one big example of why that statement is so true.
In the report’s own words, “Top employers typically recruit from
selective colleges and universities. And, selective institutions
cultivate our nation’s leadership: 49 percent of corporate industry
leaders and 50 percent of government leaders graduated from only 12
selective colleges and universities. If we want a nation where at
least some of our leaders know first-hand what it is like to grow
up poor, then the doors of selective institutions must be open to
students from all communities. Low-income students depend on higher
education as a route to social mobility, but college will never be
the great equalizer if the brightest of the poor cannot even get in
the door.”
- Turning to the topic of financial aid, the report says this:
“Our analysis of applications submitted through the Common
Application organization (“Common App”) finds that 84 percent
of high-achieving students with family incomes below $20,000 fail
to obtain the Common App fee waiver for their college applications,
despite clearly being eligible for one. This finding suggests that
it is often a lack of knowledge about how college financial aid
works that stands in the way of students applying, not students’
actual desires or financial circumstances.”
- But here is the good news that the report offers its readers:
“Research is clear that changing high-achieving, low-income
students’ understanding of how college financial aid works can
dramatically increase the number of applications they submit to
selective schools. By sending students an inexpensive mailing
costing $6, researchers were able to increase the percent of
high-achieving, low-income students who applied and were admitted
to a match institution by 31 percent. Other studies have
found that simply sending semi-customized text messages to
students’ cell phones can increase their completion of the Free Application for
Federal Student Aid (FAFSA), a necessary precursor to obtaining
a federal Pell grant. This is a critical first step as our research
suggests that only 71 percent of high-achieving,
low-income students complete the FAFSA.”
- And here is something that the report said and that we have
said many times at NYCollegeChat: “While the cost of
higher education has been rising for decades, the stated tuition
and fees at elite colleges (especially private institutions) have
skyrocketed, even after adjusting for inflation. Low-income
families, seeing these ‘sticker prices,’ often fail to understand
that with financial aid, attending a selective school might
actually cost them less than their local public
university.”
One of the scariest parts of the report for me was the section
on the college admissions process—not the applications process,
which is scary enough, but rather the admissions process, which is
how colleges choose which students to admit from those who have
applied. This section of the report does a good job of shining a
spotlight on what happens behind the scenes as college admissions
officers are pulled in this direction and that direction by various
interest groups at the college and are faced with tens of thousands
of applications to review and rank. The authors seem brutally frank
in this section of the report. I have no reason to believe that it
is not a true picture of what goes on, though I have no independent
confirmation of it. Here is one of the conclusions that the authors
draw:
The underrepresentation of high-achieving, low-income students
is in large part the result of admissions practices utilized by
selective colleges and universities that—presumably
inadvertently—advantage privileged, wealthy students. Specifically,
college and university admissions preferences provide advantages to
athletes, children of alumni, and mediocre but full-paying
students. Institutions compound the problem by giving advantages to
students who visit the campus (which few low-income applicants can
afford), apply early (which low-income students who must weigh aid
packages in making college selection decisions cannot do), take the
SAT or ACT multiple times and submit only their best scores (which
is unavailable to low-income students who will be afforded a single
fee waiver), and who do so after having been thoroughly coached
(which few low-income students can afford). Additionally,
low-income students tend not to have been exposed to college-level
work or take AP/IB courses, which because of “weighting” by the
high schools artificially inflates their GPA. Finally, the
increasing reliance [on] standardized test scores in compiling an
Academic Index to screen applications—so as not to overwhelm
admissions officers with otherwise having to read thousands of
applications—may unfairly eliminate disproportionate numbers of
low-income students on the basis of small score differences, which
we know are not predictive of college performance or indicative of
any differences in ability. (quoted from the article)
2. What Can Be Done
Well, let’s start by saying that we probably cannot change the
way that college admissions officers at highly selective colleges
review applications against criteria set by those colleges. But
here are some things that low-income parents of high-achieving kids
can and should do:
- Seriously consider whether your teenager should apply to a
college under an Early Decision plan. If not, have your teenager
apply under one or more Early Action plans, whenever possible.
Either of these routes might well increase your teenager’s chance
of acceptance.
- Arrange for your teenager to take the SAT and/or ACT more than
once, even if you have to pay for it. This act gives your teenager
a chance to improve his or her scores, and we know that these
scores are still important in most selective colleges.
- Even better, figure out a way to get your teenager into a prep
course for these college admission exams. Perhaps your school
district or a nearby community center is offering one. The
commercially available courses are expensive, to be sure—though
even that might be worth it if your teenager’s scores need some
major improvement.
- If Advanced Placement (AP) courses are available at your high
school, encourage your teenager to take one or more, if your
teenager is academically ready to do so. Great alternatives to AP
courses are dual-enrollment courses or Early College courses (if
your high school is part of an Early College program); in both of
these, students take actual college courses and earn actual college
credits during high school, with the college credits typically free
to the student. All of these options improve your teenager’s high
school record, from the colleges’ point of view, by showing
colleges that your teenager can handle college-level academic
work.
- Make sure your teenager applies for college application fee
waivers, if your family is eligible. This means that your teenager
can apply to a greater number and wider range of colleges since
there is no cost to you.
- Investigate highly selective colleges if your teenager has the
grades and test scores to apply. Then, have your teenager apply! If
you can’t get any help from the high school counselor in seeking
out highly selective colleges, get help from somewhere else—a
community leader, a teacher, or previous episodes of
NYCollegeChat. We already know that high school counselors
are overworked and underprepared to deal with many college
issues.
- Fill out the FAFSA as soon as it is available. Don’t miss the
chance to apply for financial aid.
- Once your teenager receives acceptances, encourage your
teenager to go to the most selective college that accepted him or
her. Hopefully, the financial aid offer from that college will make
that possible.
Listen to the podcast to find out about…
- More resources and forms of financial assistance available at
colleges
- More ways to improve the rigor of the senior year
- More information on Early Decision and Early Action plans
Check out these websites we mention…
Learn more about these topics in previous episodes…
Ask your questions or share your feedback by…
- Leaving a comment on the show notes for this episode at
http://nycollegechat.org/episode59
- Calling us at (516) 900-NYCC to record a question on our
NYCollegeChat voicemail if you want us to answer your question live
on our podcast
- Emailing us at paul@policystudies.org to ask a
question if you want us to answer it privately
Connect with us through…